I have been recently studying periodic classification. I am having some confusion regarding old periodic classification.
Newland's law of octaves
In that you can see, in the 4th horizontal line , cobalt and nickel in one slot. When I ask the reason, many websiteweb sites and books describe it as "in order to fit elements, he keepkeeps many elements under one slot"slot."
But I thought " why, "Why he didn't place nickel next to cobalt in another slot? Can't he?"
Why under one slot necessary although he knew they are unlike elements?
In Mendeleev's periodic table If, if you look, he places 'Na' sodium in the same group with copper and silver, while they are totally different. Sodium is veeyvery reactive, unlike copper, silver, and gold.
I found 2 different versions of Mendeleev's table ,: the first in which sodium is placed with copper and all. Second, and the second in which sodium is placed with potassium , lithium etc. (like modern table's group 1 elements) which kinda make-- that kind of makes sense.
First,
Second,
But mostly iI found the first category table on the internet.
I am confused with positioning , as positioning; for example, sodium is put with copper, silver, and gold, although they have very different properties -- even today's modern periodic table has a different group for them.
andAnd also why elements are arranged in zig zag order in group in first table not in a single straight line?