2
$\begingroup$

In On teaching mathematics, Vladimir Igorevich Arnold states

"What is a smooth manifold? In a recent American book I read that Poincaré was not acquainted with this (introduced by himself) notion and that the "modern" definition was only given by Veblen in the late 1920s: a manifold is a topological space which satisfies a long series of axioms."

When googling the last part of the last sentence, I only found references to this text by Arnold, and upon searching for Veblen and manifold from 1925-1931 on google scholar, I couldn't find anything resembling this quote, so it is probably a paraphrase of Veblen's statement.

Does anybody know what Arnold's reference might have been?

The only close thing I found was

"Since the manifolds which we are here calling “regular” are all topological spaces, they may be characterized by adding certain other axioms to the Hausdorff set."

from Oswald Veblen's Analysis Situ.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ In the case of Riemann surfaces, the standard definition was first given by Herman Weyl in 1913 ("The Concept of a Riemann Surface"). The general definition of a smooth manifold is not that far. $\endgroup$ May 12 at 13:56

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

It is difficult, if not impossible, to determine which "recent American book" Arnold is referring to, but the statement he makes is certainly correct.

There are some very interesting surveys about the history of the concept of manifold, for example in The Concept of Manifold, 1850-1950 we read (p. 15)

During the 1880s Poincare came across "manifolds" in several analytical or geometrical contexts, although he personally understood them at that time still in a rather vague way.

and (p. 16. emphasis mine)

Poincare gave a discussion which in fact spoke in favour of the surjectivity and was already sharper than Klein's, but still used highly intuitive ideas about continuous variation of images in higher dimensional spaces in a symbohcally uncontrollable manner. Even the spaces themselves were not shown to be manifolds but taken as such, without further ado. For any critical reader (perhaps even including Poincare himself) the "continuity proof" could thus be taken at least as much as an indicator for the necessity of an improved understanding of higher dimensional geometry as it was an indicator for the truth of the uniformization theorem. And in fact a clarification of the topological proof strategy was given only later by Brouwer [...]

(p. 31)

Veblen and his student J.H.C. Whitehead, coming from (and going back to) Oxford, brought the axiomatization of the manifold concept to a stage which stood up to the standards of modern mathematics in the sense of the 20th century

The axiomatization by Veblen and Whitehead was first exposed in A Set of Axioms for Differential Geometry, and then in The Foundations of Differential Geometry.

Coming back to the book Arnold refers to, one possibility could be A History of Algebraic and Differential Topology, 1900-1960 by Jean Dieudonné, published in 1989 (Arnold's paper is from 1998), but I highly doubt that Arnold would consider it an " American book".

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.