Occasionally, in a proof by mathematical induction, the writer will say something like, "We induct on $n$" or "We induct on the number of vertices." This usage of the verb induct has always sounded strange to me. My first question is:
When did mathematicians start using the verb induct in this way?
The earliest instance that I could find using Google Books was in Mathematics 281: Algebraic Topology I by Spanier in 1955, but I suspect that there are earlier instances. Florian Cajori's paper, Origin of the Name “Mathematical Induction” demonstrates that the history of the term mathematical induction goes back much further, but Cajori's article does not discuss the use of the verb induct. It looks to me like an instance of back-formation; i.e., the term induction came first, and then people decided they wanted a verb, so they came up with induct. If this hypothesis is correct, then it prompts my second question:
Has any mathematician used the term induce on instead of induct on?
The term induction is also used in the philosophy of science; the process of inferring a general principle from many instances is often called inductive reasoning, and is contrasted with deductive reasoning. Now, in logic, the verb form of deductive is deduce; nobody ever uses the verb deduct to refer to logical inference. Therefore, one might naïvely expect (by analogy) that people would use the verb induce rather than induct in the context of mathematical induction. But I don't recall ever encountering that usage. Maybe I'm just uninformed? A possible explanation for avoiding the word induce in this context is that induce has other meanings in mathematics (e.g., if $X$ is a subspace of a topological space $Y$, then the topology on $Y$ induces the subspace topology on $X$).