It was in lime light for more than a century (late 18th century to late 19th century). They say it was inspected and found fake. But, what was fake about that. There are stories that this machine won most of the matches it played. It didn't just won chess games, but it was able to complete the knight's tour(a famous chess puzzle) easily. Which most experienced chess players of that time struggled with.

Does that mean Kempelen (who created this) was himself a genius or sort of world champion chess player of that time ?

  • $\begingroup$ Is anyone else considering a chess tag? $\endgroup$
    – HDE 226868
    Commented Nov 6, 2014 at 17:57
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Since, Chess is all about permutation and combination (Mathematics). I see questions coming in future also, which may need this tag. $\endgroup$
    – Amit Tyagi
    Commented Nov 6, 2014 at 18:01
  • $\begingroup$ Okay, here's the tag. $\endgroup$
    – HDE 226868
    Commented Nov 6, 2014 at 18:01

1 Answer 1


I vaguely remember learning about the Turk in a documentary about Gary Kasparov and his match with Deep Blue. It seemed really impressive, even if it wasn't actually an automated chess-playing robot.

Here's the relevant Wikipedia article. Once again, I won't use it as a primary source, but I think that the following passage from Wikipedia gets to the heart of the matter:

The Turk was in fact a mechanical illusion that allowed a human chess master hiding inside to operate the machine. With a skilled operator, the Turk won most of the games played during its demonstrations around Europe and the Americas for nearly 84 years, playing and defeating many challengers including statesmen such as Napoleon Bonaparte and Benjamin Franklin. The operator(s) within the mechanism during Kempelen's original tour remains a mystery.

I'll quote a passage from here, summarizing how the machine worked:

The secret of the Mechanical Turk was kept for over 50 years – the machine was an elaborate illusion, and contained an ingeniously hidden compartment that housed a human operator. This hidden chess master could observe the position on the chessboard above, and manipulate the movements of the Turk.

From here, we have a slightly more in-depth summary (although I'm not too happy about the source; you can disregard it if you want):

How It Worked

Although many people had guessed that the machine actually had an operator working from the inside, few were able figure out exactly how it worked. There were guesses that the operator must be a child to fit inside the cabinet, or that someone was actually poised partially inside the figure that moved the pieces.

In fact, the operator inside the cabinet sat on a sliding seat, allowing them to adjust their position as a presenter opened doors to show what was supposedly going on inside the machine. Over the years, a number of talented chess players were responsible for playing the games, which helps explain why the machine rarely lost except when up against elite competition. From inside the cabinet, the operator could see a magnet version of the board that reacted to the movement of the pieces above (each had a strong magnet in its base) so that they were able to keep track of the position. Levers allowed for the movement of the Turk's arm and the opening and closing of its hand, which made it possible to move the pieces on command.

From here, we get a re-creation of the machine. Here (from the site) is part of the mechanism controlling the arm:

enter image description here

Here is a picture of the arm mechanisms: enter image description here

Finally, I go to this page, where we find some key information:

The concealed chess expert was cramped, hot, had to operate various levers, and worked by candlelight. But he had two advantages over his opponents:

  1. He almost always had White and so made the first move;
  2. He could explore, although only briefly, alternative variations on his second chess set, in effect cheat.
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ So, there are two aspects of the machine a) Mechanical b) Intelligence. The Mechanics(a) seems understandable. But, are we saying that the intelligence(b) was totally coming from a human brain(from somebody hidden under the box). I find it a bit difficult to buy this point. Because, a man doing this for around 85 years, needs to be a genius. And, for such man remaining hidden from the world for more than 80 years, seems mysterious again. If there were multiple chess genius hidden under over the period of time. Then also for each of them to be trained to play under such conditions wasn't easy. $\endgroup$
    – Amit Tyagi
    Commented Nov 6, 2014 at 19:20
  • $\begingroup$ From what I've been able to glean, there were different people hiding in the box throughout the history of the machine's operation. They were all pretty smart, and presumably small-ish. $\endgroup$
    – HDE 226868
    Commented Nov 6, 2014 at 19:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.