It seems a bit of a stretch to go from a battery to electrolysis but this fellow appears to have thought of it only a few weeks after Volta invented the "pile" battery.

I am wondering if he knew water's elemental components before he assembles his electrolysis device .

What gave him the idea to run electricity through it from one pole to the other I wonder. Was he expecting hydrogen and oxygen or did he have to run many tests to see what the gas elements were when the water disappeared from the tubes? It seems an amazing insight he must have had.


2 Answers 2


Mander's Carnocycle blog has a post Carlisle, Nicholson and the discovery of electrolysis with a detailed account of the story. I will only give the highlights.

On March 20th, 1800 Volta wrote to Sir Banks, the President of the Royal Society in London, describing the construction of his pile. It was an alternating assemblage of zinc and silver disc pairs separated by pieces of cloth soaked in a conducting liquid. Banks disclosed the contents of the letter to select few acquaintances, among whom was the surgeon Anthony Carlisle, who in turn shared it with William Nicholson. By 30th April 1800, Carlisle and Nicholson completed a pile of their own.

Unlike Volta, who was more preoccupied with describing how his pile electroshocked humans, Carlisle and Nicholson focused on the pile itself. As Nicholson later commented in his paper:

I cannot here look back without some surprise and observe that … the rapid oxidation of the zinc should constitute no part of his [Volta’s] numerous observations”.

The first clue came on May 1st. Steel wires were attached to the pile, and to assist contact a drop of river water was placed on the uppermost disc. Nicholson recorded:

Mr. Carlisle observed a disengagement of gas round the touching wire. This gas, though very minute in quantity, evidently seemed to me to have the smell afforded by hydrogen. This, with some other facts, led me to propose to break the circuit by the substitution of a tube of water between two wires.

The next day, after placing the wires into a water filled tube, Carlisle and Nicholson noticed a stream of hydrogen bubbles rising from the wire attached to the zinc disc, while the wire attached to the silver disc blackened from oxidation. It was intriguing that oxygen, presumably produced together with hydrogen, found its way through the water to the other wire. Nicholson wrote that it “seems to point at some general law of the agency of electricity in chemical operations”.

To investigate the "agency" they switched to electrodes made of platinum, which was known to resist oxidation. This time there were two streams of bubbles, large one coming from the zinc side and small one from the silver side, with no oxidation of the wires. “It was natural to conjecture, that the larger stream was hydrogen, and the smaller oxygen”, Nicholson concluded.

  • $\begingroup$ Hydrogen gas has a smell? $\endgroup$
    – lalala
    Dec 8, 2021 at 21:28

I think prior to electrolysis the composition of water was known -- hydrogen and oxygen were combined and in the presence of a spark water was created: https://hsm.stackexchange.com/questions/2542/how-was-the-composition-and-structure-of-water-determined#:~:text=1805%3A%20Gay%2DLussac%20and%20Humboldt,of%20oxygen%20(by%20volume).

Had these earlier experiments not been performed, the fact that water was in fact made up of two separate gases would have amazed people since water was considered an element.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thank you. The link has excellent detail. $\endgroup$
    – Sedumjoy
    Sep 22, 2022 at 12:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.