23
$\begingroup$

It is well-known that in 1755 Lagrange was appointed Professor of Mathematics at the Royal Artillery School in Turin. He was 19. His work up until then involves correspondence with Euler. Was he appointed professor by Euler's recommendation? If not, how was his talent recognised so early?

$\endgroup$
32
$\begingroup$

Lagrange enrolled to the university at the age of 14, to study law. But he quickly switched to mathematics. According to his biography, his mother was surprised when the French ambassador presented himself to congratulate her and give her the prize of the Paris Academy which Lagrange won in a public competition (by correspondence). (His mother was surprised because she assumed that her son was studying law).

In few years he probably made his name known in scientific circles. At that time mathematical results were spread mostly by correspondence, there was no regular, established journals yet. Young Lagrange corresponded not only with Euler but also with Prince Fagnano, (probably the most famous Italian mathematician of that time) and several other mathematicians. His first published paper appeared only in 1759, in a journal which he and his friends, who were actually his students, published themselves.

His correspondence with Euler started in 1754, and he was appointed Professor in 1755. The biography does not mention any interference or even recommendation of Euler, but mentions that Euler tried to arrange for him a position in Berlin in 1756. (Euler only succeeded in making him a corresponding member.)

Lagrange was not unique as a prodigy. For comparison, Alexis Clairaut wrote his first research paper at the age of 12. At the age of 13 he was invited to address the Paris Academy, and became a member of this academy at 18.

William Rowan Hamilton was appointed Professor of Astronomy shortly before his graduation from college, at the age of 22.

We may conclude that in 18th and early 19th century, the procedures were much less formal than they are nowadays: the number of mathematicians and the number of positions for them were very small, so appointments were decided on individual merits, rather than following rigid rules, as is the case nowadays. As I understand it, the Artillery Academy simply needed a good mathematician, and there were not many around. So they asked other mathematicians, and Lagrange was recommended.

Ref. I. A. Tiulina, Joseph-Louis Lagrange, "Nauka" Moscow, 1977 (in Russian).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Can you elaborate on Prince Fagnano? Googling that name only leads back to this answer. $\endgroup$ – Brady Gilg Apr 25 at 21:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Brady Gilg: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giulio_Carlo_de%27_Toschi_di_Fagnano $\endgroup$ – Alexandre Eremenko Apr 25 at 21:26
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, the Russian biography of Lagrange which I used says "Prince" which is a common Russian equivalent of a "Duke". But Wikipedia says he was only a Count. His own book lists his titles as "Conte" and "Marchese". $\endgroup$ – Alexandre Eremenko Apr 25 at 21:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.