Questions tagged [set-theory]

For questions about the mathematical branch that is based on the study of sets, i.e. collections of objects.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
1 vote
0 answers
78 views

Whence Whitehead's essence?

In the article Quine’s New Foundations of The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition), Thomas Forster writes: In [1944] Hailperin gave the first of a number of finite ...
Frode Alfson Bjørdal's user avatar
11 votes
1 answer
1k views

What was the motivation for the choice of the subset symbol?

I gather that the symbols $\subset$ and $\supset$ were introduced by Ernst Schröder in his 1890 Vorlesungen über die Algebra der Logik. This account also appears—attributed to good old Cajori—in an ...
Paul Tanenbaum's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
162 views

Was "potency set" used for power set?

Cross posted at Math Overflow For historical reasons, the English term "power set" in set theory is a translation of the German "Potenzmenge", which is still in use in German ...
Frode Alfson Bjørdal's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
174 views

Who proposed terminating decimals as a major set and why are them important in France?

After looking at some school sources in French, it is common to provide the various number sets in the following order $$\mathbb{N}\subset \mathbb{Z}\subset\mathbb{D}\subset\mathbb{Q}\subset\mathbb{R}\...
Mauricio's user avatar
  • 2,688
0 votes
0 answers
62 views

Who was the first to use bijections?

I know that Bourbaki were the first who used the word 'bijection', but one-to one functions were for sure used before them. So do you aware of the earliest examples of one-to-one correspondences?
kerzol's user avatar
  • 101
6 votes
1 answer
452 views

Cantor, set theory and foundations

Did Georg Cantor ever think that set theory could serve as a foundational system for all of mathematics? He died in 1918, but Zermelo set theory (just Z, no ZF or ZFC yet) was described in a paper by ...
Alex's user avatar
  • 275
2 votes
0 answers
89 views

Was there a view of a figure as a set of points before set theory?

A circle can be written as the solution set of an equation $x^2+y^2=1$. I have heard that Fermat associated figures with equations in the 17th century. Did people see figures as sets of points before ...
BonBon's user avatar
  • 151
0 votes
0 answers
60 views

What are Gödel's property theories

The opening sentence of Roger Myhill's article Paradoxes, in Synthese 60 (1984), 129-143, is: “Gödel said to me more than once "There never were any set-theoretic paradoxes, but the property-...
Frode Alfson Bjørdal's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
148 views

Zermelo's or Fraenkel's early consideration of something equivalent to countable Replacement

I have now claimed a few times on the internet, based on something (sensible!) I read, that at some point in the 1920s, that Zermelo at one point considered as a set theoretic axiom (schema) something ...
David Roberts's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
135 views

What problem was Borel trying to solve?

I may be mistaken but I understood that Borel developed his sigma algebra before Lebesgue developed his measure. If correct, then Borel can't have been trying to find a collection of sets in $\mathbb{...
TonyK's user avatar
  • 315
4 votes
1 answer
151 views

Did Cantor coin the terms countable and uncountable? If not, who did?

I just assumed that he did since we owe the proof that $\mathbb{R}$ is uncountable to him, but a search of my favorite source for answering such questions -- https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/...
TonyK's user avatar
  • 315
2 votes
0 answers
90 views

The definition of 'countable' and 'finite' set

I have an equivalent definition of finite and countable sets that seems 'less' based on set theory than the usual definitions. I am wondering if anyone has encountered these definitions anywhere, esp....
Sam Sanders's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
165 views

where does trace $\sigma$-algebra come from

I came across the term trace $\sigma$-algebra in the context of conditional probability. Does anyone know where it comes from? i found a reference to trace of a matrix here: https://mathshistory.st-...
TonyK's user avatar
  • 315
0 votes
1 answer
174 views

When did Zermelo and Fraenkel publish their axioms?

I have googled the heck out of this but cannot find a reference to the year Z&F published their axioms. I'd expected to see an article reference but none that I could find.
TonyK's user avatar
  • 315
6 votes
1 answer
394 views

Definition of ordinal multiplication

The ordinal multiplication $\cdot$ can be defined recursively via ordinal addition $+$ for any ordinal $\alpha$ as follows: $\alpha\cdot 0=0$. $\alpha\cdot (\beta+1)=\alpha\cdot \beta+\alpha$ for any ...
modnar's user avatar
  • 565
10 votes
1 answer
2k views

Origin of Q for the set of rational numbers?

It seems many sources$^1$ attribute the use of the letter "Q" to represent the rationals to the N. Bourbaki group (in the 1930's); however, the Wikipedia entry on rational numbers claims ...
Rax Adaam's user avatar
  • 474
8 votes
1 answer
317 views

Origin / first use of $\mathbb{Z}$ (blackboard bold Z)?

I'm aware that the choice of "Z" comes from German zahlen (for "numbers"); however, I was curious to know when the dedicated font, which I believe is called "blackboard bold&...
Rax Adaam's user avatar
  • 474
2 votes
0 answers
105 views

Where can I find the actual first order formulation of ZFC Axioms?

I'm currently writing my thesis about ZFC origins, and I need a source from where to know who gives the actual first order formulation of ZFC. I got to the point where Bernays writes about it and ...
TransfiniteGuy's user avatar
13 votes
4 answers
2k views

How was Fourier analysis important to the development of set theory?

I recently read the following quote (unfortunately, I copied it down without attribution): You may be surprised to know that Fourier analysis played a role in the early development of set theory. In ...
10GeV's user avatar
  • 259
4 votes
0 answers
143 views

What role has Whitehead's Conjecture played in the thinking on the plurality of set theories?

I am curious about the history of the Whitehead's Conjecture, as this was the first natural mathematical statement, in the sense that mathematicians were actually interested in the answer, that was ...
Mozibur Ullah's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
666 views

How did ZFC become the standard foundations of mathematics?

I would like to hear about the historical and technical reasons for why Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with the axiom of Choice became the dominant standard for the foundations of mathematics. The system ...
Alex's user avatar
  • 275
2 votes
2 answers
277 views

In which article/book chapter did Cantor, Hilbert, and Poincaré formally define or directly discusse the term “potential infinity”?

Some media sources say that "Cantor claimed that there would only be potential infinity, not actual infinity" In addition, the following link claims that Hilbert, Poincaré, and Cantor were ...
High GPA's user avatar
  • 123
0 votes
0 answers
367 views

Has Cantor's irregular enumeration of rationals ever been discussed?

Enumeration of all positive fractions recently has gained renewed interest (see the list below). By translation invariance we can be sure that in all intervals (n, n+1] of the real axis, there are the ...
Franz Kurz's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
89 views

Kreisel on "set" as a coherent idea

In his paper Two notes on the foundations of set-theory, Kreisel begins: Recall that, naively, sets present themselves in a number of distinct contexts. [...] One may therefore doubt whether any ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
184 views

Were $\sigma$-algebras defined for probability?

If you want a crash course in $\sigma$-algebras and probability spaces, you should absolutely read this amazing answer by @Sycorax on Cross Validated. Sycorax says something in particular though that ...
gen-ℤ ready to perish's user avatar
11 votes
1 answer
306 views

Why were equivalence classes named classes rather than sets?

If $R\subseteq A\times A$ is an equivalence relation (i.e., a relation that is reflexive on $A$, symmetric, and transitive), then for each element $x\in A$, the subset $[x]_R=\{y\in A: \langle x,y\...
evenodd's user avatar
  • 213
1 vote
1 answer
192 views

History of exponential notation for the set of functions between two sets

It's well-known that if $A$ and $B$ are two sets, then the set of all functions from $A$ to $B$ can be denoted by $B^A$: explanations of this particular notation can be found in many places: https://...
user6530's user avatar
  • 3,370
12 votes
2 answers
1k views

How many important logicians did NOT receive doctoral degrees?

I can think of three. Saul Kripke quite famously could only be begrudged to finish his undergraduate degree at Harvard before being hired as a full professor. Donald Martin (the set theorist of Martin'...
jmarvin_'s user avatar
  • 121
8 votes
1 answer
373 views

What were the not-so-convincing reasons for using the word "power" for power sets?

A footnote of Enderton's Elements of Set Theory (1977, page 4) for the definition of power set states that the reasons for using the word "power" in this context are not very convincing, but the ...
modnar's user avatar
  • 565
3 votes
0 answers
157 views

Translations of "Sur le théorème de Zorn"?

Are there any translations of the following into English, German, or Russian? Nicolas Bourbaki, Sur le théorème de Zorn, Archiv der Mathematik, Volume 2, pages 434–437, November 1949. Any help is ...
user avatar
10 votes
1 answer
332 views

Was the continuum hypothesis commonly believed to be independent before Cohen's proof?

Someone drew my attention to the Russian translation of Rademacher and Toeplitz's Von Zahlen und Figuren (The Enjoyment of Mathematics in the English translation). In the chapter on set theory the ...
AnatolyVorobey's user avatar
5 votes
3 answers
761 views

What brought about the need for real analysis and formal logic in recent years?

I can't seem to find a clear, definitive, non-circular answer on this. For centuries and centuries, we've been doing mathematics in one form or another, be it geometry and pictures, or inventing ...
user525966's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
115 views

Lengths as equivalence classes

From Wikipedia on cardinal numbers: The oldest definition of the cardinality of a set $X$ (implicit in Cantor and explicit in Frege and Principia Mathematica) is as the class $[X]$ of all sets ...
Hans-Peter Stricker's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
288 views

Cantor's fortune

Wiki says that his transfinite numbers met opposition: Henri Poincaré referred to his ideas as a "grave disease" infecting the discipline of mathematics, and Leopold Kronecker's public ...
user157860's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
388 views

Can we identify Paul Benacerraf in these photos

This question is about Paul Benacerraf, who worked on the philosophy of mathematics, and wrote the 1965 essay What numbers could not be (see: Benacerraf's identification problem). He was at Princeton ...
David Roberts's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
166 views

Who decided on the convention for ordinal multiplication?

Ordinal multiplication has always seemed backwards to me. $\alpha \times \beta$ is defined as the concatenation of $\beta$ copies of $\alpha$, not the other way 'round as one might expect. Does this ...
user4894's user avatar
  • 1,305
9 votes
1 answer
354 views

Was Paul Cohen a student or assistant of Gödel?

In The Man Who Loved Only Numbers, a biography about Paul Erdős, by Paul Hoffman, the author claims that Paul Cohen was "Gödel's former assistant" (p 225). However, I can't find any other sources ...
Kevin Long's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
297 views

Who was (were) the first mathematician(s) who did not doubt the empty set?

Today there is no doubt that the empty set for the whole of mathematics is as reasonable and useful as zero for arithmetic. This however was not always the case, and surprisingly even Zermelo, who ...
Franz Kurz's user avatar
4 votes
2 answers
547 views

When did set theory throw off theology?

"The general set theory [...] definitely belongs to metaphysics. You can easily convince yourself when examining the categories of cardinal numbers and the order type, these basic notions of set ...
Franz Kurz's user avatar
0 votes
2 answers
163 views

Did Zermelo in 1914 miss the fact that there are only countably many finite strings?

Did Zermelo in 1914 miss the fact, known in 1905 already, that there are only countably many finite strings, for instance polynomials with defined parameters? He wrote: Every real or complex number $\...
Franz Kurz's user avatar
-2 votes
1 answer
224 views

Endorsers of the method of well-ordering reported by Hausdorff?

In the course of preparing a lecture for graduate students about errors of early set theory I have come across this nice example reported by Hausdorff which violates Peano's successor axiom but ...
Franz Kurz's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
158 views

Details of Hilbert's proof of the continuum hypothesis [closed]

Toward the end of his paper on the infinite Hilbert sketched his proof of the continuum hypothesis. [D. Hilbert: "Über das Unendliche", Mathematische Annalen 95 (1925)] Can experts on Hilbert give ...
Franz Kurz's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
367 views

Was Hilbert ambivalent about set theory?

There is the well-known quote of Hilbert: "No one shall drive us from the paradise which Cantor has created for us." [D. Hilbert: "Über das Unendliche", Mathematische Annalen 95 (...
Franz Kurz's user avatar
6 votes
4 answers
674 views

Is there a formal distinction between potential and actual infinities?

In modern set theory the difference between actual infinity and potential infinity is often not understood or even denied. Some decades back however mathematicians like Hilbert or Poincaré, let alone ...
Franz Kurz's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
431 views

Why was Kronecker dissatisfied with Cantor's submitted paper?

It is said here that In 1874 Cantor published an article in Crelle's Journal which marks the birth of set theory. A follow-up paper was submitted by Cantor to Crelle's Journal in 1878 but already set ...
user51309's user avatar
  • 205
2 votes
0 answers
251 views

Set Theory, onto and into their relation to spoken language definitions

Does anyone know how the definitions for onto and into map to the spoken language definitions of the words? I compared the Bourbaki definitions to these words and have a suspicion that the German ...
Nick's user avatar
  • 121
2 votes
1 answer
180 views

Did Cantor knew the work of Paul du Bois-Reymond (the original inventor of the diagonal argument proof method in mathematics)? [duplicate]

In the wikipedia page about Cantor's diagonal argument, it says: Historically, the diagonal argument first appeared in the work of Paul du Bois-Reymond in 1875. However, the diagonal argument is ...
user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
222 views

What was Zermelo's _reception_ of von Neumann's definition of ordinal numbers?

Redactional note Like suggested by one of this question's (or so I understand the meta.discussion), this question should be given some too-many-subquestions-redacting, in particular since the easiest ...
Peter Heinig's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
166 views

Where was it first proved that the cardinality of the continuum equals the cardinality of the power set of the naturals?

I can find many resources regarding Cantor's proof of the uncountability of the continuum. But was he the first to prove that $\mathfrak{c} = | \mathfrak{P} (\mathbf{N})|$? Which paper?
Maxis Jaisi's user avatar
14 votes
0 answers
573 views

Did Kronecker say that set theory is not mathematics?

I have frequently come across Kronecker's statement about set theory: I don't know what predominates in Cantor's theory - philosophy or theology, but I am sure that there is no mathematics there. It ...
Franz Kurz's user avatar