Skip to main content

New answers tagged

0 votes

Egyptian origin of Euclid's axiomatisation of geometry

Actually, Arnold was only drawing from Proclus Diadochus, who wrote the following in his Commentary of Euclid's Elements (Book 1): We must next speak of the origin of geometry in the present world ...
user22254's user avatar
8 votes

Is this a misstatement of Euclid in Halmos' Naive Set Theory book?

Halmos does not mention Euclid by name. Axiomatic approach to geometry indeed does not use these "definitions", neither Euclid really does. Since original text of Euclid has not been ...
Alexandre Eremenko's user avatar
13 votes
Accepted

Is this a misstatement of Euclid in Halmos' Naive Set Theory book?

No error at all. Euclid's definitions: Definition 1. A point is that which has no part. Definition 2. A line is breadthless length, are probably later interpolations aimed at clarify the primitive ...
Mauro ALLEGRANZA's user avatar

Top 50 recent answers are included