Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Jul 6, 2020 at 2:21 history edited N. Virgo
Added tag.
S Jul 6, 2020 at 2:21 history suggested Rodrigo de Azevedo
Added tag.
Jul 5, 2020 at 16:30 review Suggested edits
S Jul 6, 2020 at 2:21
Mar 6, 2020 at 17:01 answer added Mozibur Ullah timeline score: 1
May 31, 2018 at 20:54 comment added Robert Furber @BillyRubina That footnote says that he "might have been pre-empted" by Thierry of Chartres. This does not imply that Russell had any awareness of his work.
S Jun 20, 2017 at 13:23 history suggested Franz Kurz CC BY-SA 3.0
Orthography and syntax
Jun 20, 2017 at 11:24 review Suggested edits
S Jun 20, 2017 at 13:23
Jun 15, 2017 at 14:20 answer added Franz Kurz timeline score: -3
Jan 23, 2016 at 16:24 comment added Red Banana When I heard this paradox for the first time, I was curious: What sort of mathematical entity was Russell thinking in order to obtain this? According to Peter J Cameron, he was motivated by some readings on the theologian Thierry of Chartres. Jesus is always a screw up, see?
Oct 5, 2015 at 8:06 answer added Nikolaj-K timeline score: 4
Sep 20, 2015 at 10:19 comment added Paul Siegel Note that Russell's paradox doesn't actually break all that much of even naive set theory; it only comes up when you try to create really big sets. You can do most of combinatorics without straying beyond finite sets, and you can do most of analysis without straying beyond subsets of Euclidean space (or maybe sets of continuous functions on Euclidean space, which also aren't a problem). These sorts of foundational issues really only showed up on working mathematicians' radar screens when algebraists and topologists started to embrace the language of categories and universal constructions.
Sep 18, 2015 at 5:43 vote accept N. Virgo
Sep 17, 2015 at 12:24 answer added Alexandre Eremenko timeline score: 16
Sep 17, 2015 at 8:36 review First posts
Sep 17, 2015 at 8:40
Sep 17, 2015 at 8:27 history asked N. Virgo CC BY-SA 3.0