Timeline for Old perception of the sunset: the sun is going ABOVE the horizen. does anyone heard such a thing?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2016 at 1:31 | answer | added | Peter Diehr | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 7, 2016 at 18:23 | answer | added | Margaret Friedland | timeline score: 2 | |
| S Mar 6, 2016 at 11:02 | history | suggested | vonbrand | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Title capitalization, typos
|
| Mar 6, 2016 at 1:43 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 6, 2016 at 11:02 | |||||
| Mar 3, 2016 at 21:04 | comment | added | Ynk | (maybe they thought so because the upper western sky is red after sunset so they've tryed to explain it by saying that the sun enterd to the sky== meaning that it starts to getting higher and higher until dissappearing in the upper atmospher. otherwise why the sky's turning red if the body of the sun allready went under the ground?.... this is the reason why to assume such a thing) | |
| Mar 3, 2016 at 20:58 | comment | added | Alexandre Eremenko | I do not see why would anyone say such a weird thing. Astronomers usually describe and explain what they SEE. | |
| Mar 3, 2016 at 15:57 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 8, 2016 at 3:39 | |||||
| Mar 3, 2016 at 15:54 | history | asked | Ynk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |