Timeline for How did the bra-ket notation become mainstream in quantum mechanics?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8 at 13:16 | vote | accept | Calmarius | ||
| Dec 8 at 12:35 | comment | added | Alexandre Eremenko | @Peter Diehr: the first link you gave requires CERN login. Could you cite the paper by giving the author and the title? | |
| Dec 8 at 12:30 | history | edited | Alexandre Eremenko | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| S Dec 8 at 2:52 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
replace <> with langle/rangle from actual bra/ket notation
|
| Dec 8 at 2:39 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 8 at 2:52 | |||||
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:51 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://hsm.stackexchange.com/ with https://hsm.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 9, 2016 at 18:58 | comment | added | Peter Diehr | This article discusses the Dirac notation, and explains a bit about why mathematicians and physicists have different tastes. Dirac's paper is here, which exhibits his completed sysstem in 1939. It's all based on older notations, such as Grassman algebra; it was certainly not an independent invention, but rather an adaptation which suited Dirac's desire for conciseness. | |
| Apr 9, 2016 at 17:31 | history | answered | Alexandre Eremenko | CC BY-SA 3.0 |