Timeline for How did the publication feat of Einstein's four 1905 Annus Mirabilis papers get through peer review?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2021 at 18:22 | comment | added | Pere | Probably that was in the 1900s or 1910s, not in 1935. | |
| Jun 18, 2020 at 8:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 19, 2017 at 0:22 | comment | added | Tom Au | I don't recall the details, but I have a recollection that there were then about six people in the world qualified to understand Einstein's paper, and all (or most) of the six gave him positive reviews. | |
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:51 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://hsm.stackexchange.com/ with https://hsm.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 1:32 | comment | added | DBS | ~90-95%! That statistic, along with the lack of formal peer review, and what I learned from @Dave L Renfro's comment above really clear up my misconceptions on this issue. | |
| Apr 12, 2017 at 9:41 | comment | added | Danu♦ | Note that the one time Einstein did get reviewed, it was by Robertson (of FLRW metric fame) and Robertson heavily critized/straight-up refuted Einstein's main conclusions (the non(!)-existence of gravitational waves). This probably contributed to Einstein's disgust. | |
| Apr 12, 2017 at 0:57 | vote | accept | DBS | ||
| Apr 12, 2017 at 0:08 | comment | added | Alexandre Eremenko | Einstein lived in good times:-) | |
| Apr 11, 2017 at 21:50 | history | edited | Conifold | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 17 characters in body
|
| Apr 11, 2017 at 20:55 | history | answered | Conifold | CC BY-SA 3.0 |