Timeline for Who decided on the convention for ordinal multiplication?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 27, 2019 at 4:25 | comment | added | user4894 | @paulgarrett You're right, it's the same definition. Different convention. You convinced me! | |
S Jan 27, 2019 at 3:03 | history | suggested | paul garrett | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
with original questioner's more-or-less approval, altered wording to clarify
|
Jan 26, 2019 at 23:45 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jan 27, 2019 at 3:03 | |||||
Jan 26, 2019 at 23:45 | comment | added | paul garrett | Yes, I did mean that the two different conventions really do "define" the same thing, it's just a notational thing, not mathematical. I'll edit your title, then, if you don't object. | |
Jan 26, 2019 at 23:26 | comment | added | user4894 | @paulgarrett Yes I can see that. But isn't the convention the definition? I'm not sure what the difference is. Unless you mean that the two possible conventions are essentially the same definition, as opposed to some completely different definition. I don't care if you want to edit it. A few weeks ago someone suggested adding some tags and I rejected the edit by mistake, if that person wants to try again I'll approve. | |
Jan 26, 2019 at 23:16 | comment | added | paul garrett | I hesitate to edit the title myself, but it might be more precisely to the point to ask about the convention for ordinal mult, rather than just "definition"... which connotes something different. | |
S Jan 26, 2019 at 22:12 | history | suggested | user6215 |
real tag instead of untagged
|
|
Jan 26, 2019 at 18:20 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jan 26, 2019 at 22:12 | |||||
Jan 6, 2019 at 10:36 | review | Suggested edits | |||
Jan 6, 2019 at 15:27 | |||||
Jun 18, 2018 at 18:42 | vote | accept | user4894 | ||
Jun 17, 2018 at 22:14 | answer | added | Gerald Edgar | timeline score: 3 | |
Jun 17, 2018 at 20:29 | history | asked | user4894 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |