3
$\begingroup$

It seems the western calendar originated with months starting in March: with that convention

  • September is the 7th month and starts in "sept" for 7
  • October is the 8th month and start in "octo" for 8
  • November is the 9th month and start in "nove" for 9
  • December is the 10th month and start in "dec" for 10
  • The extra day 29th of February is now last of the year
  • The duration of months follows a more regular pattern. With Long (31) and Short months noted L and S: LSLSL LSLSL LS

What's the history/rationale of moving the start of year from March to January?

$\endgroup$
6
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Some of this Wikipedia entry en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_calendar#New_Year's_Day may be relevant. $\endgroup$
    – mdewey
    Commented Aug 14 at 12:49
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Various sources suggest that when Julius Caesar introduced the Julian calendar he chose January as the first month in honour of Janus, the Roman god of beginnings. E.g., britannica.com/question/… $\endgroup$
    – nwr
    Commented Aug 14 at 13:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @nwr I always wondered whether it was the other way round. "What shall we call the first month , O Julius" "Why not after the god of beginning?". $\endgroup$
    – mdewey
    Commented Aug 14 at 15:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @nwr I believe you are misreading the source you quote: "The Roman republican calendar and the Julian calendar both recognized January 1 as the beginning of the New Year" means that Caesar did not change the starting day of the year, as it was already 1st January in the Roman republican calendar. If we go by what wikipedia says, the Romans themselves gave conflicting accounts of when they had changed the start of the consular year (which may or may not have been the same as the one in use for the rituals) from March to January. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_calendar $\endgroup$
    – Gae. S.
    Commented Aug 15 at 0:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Gae.S. Good point. Yes, I appear to have misunderstood. $\endgroup$
    – nwr
    Commented Aug 15 at 1:40

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

The ancient Roman civil year coincided with the administrations of the consuls. Each pair of consuls reigned for one year.

And apparently the Romans sometimes changed the date when new consuls took office.

From 223 to 153 BC the consuls took office on the Ides of March.

From 153 BC the consuls took office on the Kalends of January, or January 1. So from 153 BC the Roman civil year began on January 1.

Wikipedia: When did the Roman consular year begin during the republic and empire.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Perhaps worth noting that in England the civil year used to start on Lady Day (March 25) until the adoption of the Gregorian calendar en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calendar_(New_Style)_Act_1750 which accounts for why our tax year still starts on April 6 (we "lost" eleven days in the change over). $\endgroup$
    – mdewey
    Commented Aug 15 at 13:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.