Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with euler
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 6788
5
votes
What are some of Euler's mistakes?
However there is no evidence that these interpretations were common or even used in Euler time. … So, this is not a mistake at all, at least until someone proves that Euler meant one of these interpretations. …
- 883
2
votes
What is the basis of the claim that $F_5$ was fully factored in 1732?
So, even Euler never claimed that 6700417 is prime, we can be almost sure that he knew it. And even if he didn't test it, it would be a simple exercise for his readers. …
- 883