Skip to main content

I really liked Hermann Weyl's mathematical books and would like to get accustomed to general relativity from his perspective, but wonder if it's still relevant after almost 100 (!) years?
Can this book be used to actually learn something useful about GR or should it be read only as investigation of historical perspective? Won't it cause any misconceptions?

I really liked Hermann Weyl's mathematical books and would like to get accustomed to general relativity from his perspective, but wonder if it's still relevant after almost 100 (!) years?
Can book be used to actually learn something useful about GR or should be read only as investigation of historical perspective? Won't it cause any misconceptions?

I really liked Hermann Weyl's mathematical books and would like to get accustomed to general relativity from his perspective, but wonder if it's still relevant after almost 100 (!) years?
Can this book be used to actually learn something useful about GR or should it be read only as investigation of historical perspective? Won't it cause any misconceptions?

Source Link
Slaus
  • 181
  • 1

Is Hermann Weyl's book “Space, Time, Matter” (1923) on General Relativity still relevant?

I really liked Hermann Weyl's mathematical books and would like to get accustomed to general relativity from his perspective, but wonder if it's still relevant after almost 100 (!) years?
Can book be used to actually learn something useful about GR or should be read only as investigation of historical perspective? Won't it cause any misconceptions?