What were some back-of-the-envelope estimates that scientists made where the result of the estimate was important to either the intellectual development of the field or had significant social consequences?

For example, Helmholtz made some simple estimates to show that chemical energy could not possibly fuel the sun for its known lifespan, then argued that the only remaining energy source was gravitational, and used this to estimate an (incorrect) upper bound for the age of the sun. A detailed model or extensive calculation wasn't necessary; his points could be made just as well with order of magnitude numbers.

This is different from, for example, Fermi's famous estimation of the yield of the first atomic weapon test by dropping slips of paper. While his estimation was impressive, there was (I presume) a team of scientists collecting far more data and crunching through more detailed models to calculate the yield to much greater accuracy than Fermi a short time later, so while his estimation was interesting and amusing it had little real consequence. On the other hand, Taylor's estimate of the Trinity test yield based on photos from a magazine might count because he was able to reveal important classified information with this estimate, and he came to with a very simple method, not needing the more detailed approaches he had been considering.

  • $\begingroup$ How "back-of-the-envelope" is it supposed to be? In 1999 Tegmark did some ballparking on decoherence rates in the brain and concluded that the brain was too "warm, wet and noisy" for quantum effects to make a difference (contra to "consciousness causes collapse" and "quantum free will" hopes). This sure prompted a lot of "intellectual development", "warm, wet and noisy" became a meme. $\endgroup$
    – Conifold
    Oct 13 at 23:57
  • $\begingroup$ @Conifold Thanks, I think that would be a great answer! $\endgroup$ Oct 14 at 13:05
  • $\begingroup$ The problem is that "order of magnitude" depends on the size of the numbers involved and on the estimated uncertainty in the simple analysis in question. $\endgroup$ Oct 14 at 13:08
  • $\begingroup$ Many of Fermi's theoretical achievements, such as the 4-Fermi theory of weak decays or Fermi's Golden rule evince the same genius for paring off the inessential, even though they are not numerical estimates. $\endgroup$ Oct 14 at 21:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.