[This question is about popular conceptions and therefore goes into strange directions, don't get too shocked]

The notion of spacetime can be traced back to roughly the 18th century where some people like Lagrange and d'Alembert started to idly speculate about time and space being part of a same whole, and we can consider its official birth to be that of Minkowski's paper on the topic in 1908, but however there exists a rather uncertain era in between the two where time as a fourth dimension seems to occasionally pop up.

The obvious intermediary step in between would be for instance Hamilton's theory of quaternions, but there are however some weird outliers as well : H. G. Wells' "The Time Machine" in 1895 refers to spacetime, quite right at the beginning, ie :

“Now, it is very remarkable that this is so extensively overlooked,” continued the Time Traveller, with a slight accession of cheerfulness. “Really this is what is meant by the Fourth Dimension, though some people who talk about the Fourth Dimension do not know they mean it. It is only another way of looking at Time. There is no difference between Time and any of the three dimensions of Space except that our consciousness moves along it. But some foolish people have got hold of the wrong side of that idea. You have all heard what they have to say about this Fourth Dimension?”

The influences of this are quite hard to find. In a much more general direction, the notion of a fourth dimension in general seems to have been popularized by among other people Zöllner's "Transcendental Physics" in 1875[1], in which he tries to tie the notion of higher dimension to supernatural forces, an idea which is found in later popular books like Blavatsky's Secret Doctrine, or C. W. Leadbeater's book on remote viewing. In particular, Schofield's book "Another World"[2] seems to reference Mr. Wells [I assume it is H. G. Wells here] in 1905,

Many speculations concerning the fourth dimension have been made since this book was first issued, notably that by Mr. Wells that it is " Time."

Making it seem as though this was a well known idea at the time, at least within some circles.

The idea of a fourth dimension also comes up in Charles Hinton's writings on the topic in 1880[3], including a method of visualizing the fourth dimension which uses time as an analogy for the fourth dimension, although he does not seem to actually say that the fourth dimension itself is time. Flatland appears a few years later with much similar ideas on the topic.

Did H. G. Wells have some kind of notion of spacetime that he commonly talked about outside of his stories, and do we know where that idea came from exactly?

Edit : Some hints from Wells' autobiography :

In the students' Debating Society, of which I will tell more later, I heard about and laid hold of the idea of a four dimensional frame for a fresh apprehension of physical phenomena, which afterwards led me to send a paper, "The Universe Rigid," to the Fortnightly Review (a paper which was rejected by Frank Harris as incomprehensible), and gave me a frame for my first scientific fantasia, the Time Machine, and there was moreover a rather elaborate joke going on with Jennings and the others, about a certain "Universal Diagram" I proposed to make, from which all phenomena would be derived by a process of deduction.

  • $\begingroup$ You mean 19th century? $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 17, 2023 at 18:25

1 Answer 1


A nice history was given by Archibald, R.C. (1914), "Time as a fourth dimension", Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 20 (8): 409–412 https://doi.org/10.1090%2FS0002-9904-1914-02511-X

Regarding Wells, it says:

Apparently independent of earlier suggestion, a writer in Nature [March 26, 1885, vol. 31, p. 481; "Four-dimensional space," by " S ."] developed the idea of "time-space." A decade later the popular English novelist Herbert George Wells wrote a serial, for W. E. Henley's New Review [Jan.-June, 1895, vol. 12; "The time machine," republished in book form, London, 1895.] in which an invention for negotiating similar "space" is basic.

Here is a link to the above mentioned article that discusses "time-space" in Nature from 1885, anonymously written and signed as "S.": https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Four-Dimensional_Space

EDIT: Time as fourth dimension appeared in a satirical and popular essay "Der Raum hat vier Dimensionen" (English: Space has four dimensions) published as early as 1846 in the book "Vier Paradoxa" by German physicist and philosopher Gustav Fechner (under the pseudonym "Dr. Mises"). For instance he wrote:

p.37: Um die Gestalten des Raums mit vier Dimensionen zu berechnen, hat er blos nöthig, seine Variable $t$ als vierte Raumcoordinate zu betrachten. (English: In order to compute the shapes of space of four dimensions, he is only required to consider his variable $t$ as fourth coordinate of space.)

Fechner's views have been described by John Alexander Gunn, in his book "The Problem of Time" (1929), as follows on page 207:

After considering life in a two-dimensional plane and then in a three-dimensional, he concluded that a higher dimension must always present itself as a time-succession. Fechner urged that the third dimension, to a being unable to rise above it in an active intuition and construction, must present itself as a time-succession. A two-dimensional being is able to move and construct freely in a plane world while subjectively (unconsciously) existing in the third dimension. A three-dimensional being is able to move and construct freely in a three-dimensional space while unconsciously living in the fourth. The conscious mind of man surveys time in memory and imagination only because it lives in a dimension of reality still higher than the time-succession, but one which implies the time-dimension: The analytic succession of time-flow is below the synthetic unity of the ego for which that succession is.

See also:


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.